The rules of reviewing scientific articles

Articles submitted to the editorial board of the journal “Bulletin of the Institute of languages. The series of philological, pedagogical, historical and philosophical sciences”, pass a preliminary examination (conducted by members of the editorial board – specialists in the relevant branch of science) and are accepted in accordance with the established procedure. Requirements for the design of the original articles are given in each issue of the journal.

If the manuscript is accepted, the editorial stuff reports the author comments on the content and design of the article that need to be resolved before transfer the text for analysis.

Then the article reviewed compulsorily members of editorial board or experts of the relevant specialty (candidates and doctors of sciences).

The review should contain a reasonable listing qualities article, including scientific novelty of the problem, its relevance, factual and historical value, accuracy, style, using contemporary sources, and also motivated its enumeration deficiencies. In the conclusion of an overall assessment of the articles and recommendations for editorial board-post article, publish it after finalization, directed to an additional consideration specialist for a certain topic or decline. The amount of reviews is not less than one page of text.

Article, adapted to publication, but needs to be updated, forwarded to the authors with the comments of the reviewer and editor. Authors must make all the necessary corrections in the final manuscript and return to the editor of the amended text, as well as its identical to the electronic version along with the original version of the manuscript. After reworking the article repeatedly reviewed and Editorial Board decides on its publication. Article, adopted to publication, but needs to be updated, forwarded to the authors with the comments of the reviewer and editor. Authors must make all the necessary corrections in the final manuscript and return to the editor of the amended text, as well as its identical to the electronic version along with the original version of the manuscript. After reworking the article repeatedly reviewed and Editorial Board decides on its publication.

Article shall be considered to have been accepted for publication in the presence of positive reviews and if it was supported by members of the editorial board. The order and priority of publication of an article is determined depending on the date of receipt of the final version.

Reviewing manuscripts is carried out confidentially. Revelation of the confidential details of the peer review of a manuscript infringes the rights of the author. Reviewers are not permitted to make copies of articles for their needs.

Reviewers, as well as members of the Editorial Board have no right to use for their own purposes the information contained in the manuscript before its publication. Reviews are stored in the editorial office for 5 years.

The editorial board sends copies of reviews to the HAC under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan for admission to the editor of the publication of the corresponding request.